Immediately upon reading the last page of “To Build a Castle: My Life as a Dissenter” by Vladimir Bukovsky, I dash to the lower level of our home where, hidden from view beneath a sofa table and behind the sofa, are four overspilling boxes of books that I’ve no room to properly house on five bookshelves stationed throughout the house. I pull the sofa out and paw through the books. Ah, there it is, a worn paperback copy of “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” by Alexander Solzhenitsyn. I will reread it this week in between sprucing up the grounds which are splendidly springing back to life as the warm weather returns.
I woke last night to a nightmare, which found me fleeing for my life to escape the SVR. It was complicated and required some Devin Nunes-type maneuvers on my part, of nighttime hopping from one vehicle to another and such. At some point I was hiding in a high-tier sleeping bunk when a Russian operative found me. I was unarmed but, lo and behold, hidden in the bunk was a fully loaded military-type pistol. As the male agent slowly neared, it was necessary for him to look up to meet my eyes. I stared right-straight back at him, when it occurred to me that this wasn’t an “it’s you or me” thing. I understood that my immediate reaction encompassed protecting the well-being of my grandchildren (and all of my future progeny) from this Russian agent (and the couple of ghost-like figures he had half hidden in the shadows behind him.)
It’s you, Rus, or it’s my innocent bloodline, I thought. So I, a pacifist, but sensing I’d simply no alternative, calmly picked up the gun and fired away, point blank, rendering him thoroughly and lastingly lifeless. I woke immediately. I lay quietly in my bed with two thoughts. Which were: Let’s face it, you are not really brave enough to pull that off. And that the actual point of this dream seems to be that we humans are all capable of evil, evil that is committed in the name of combatting evil. And such is the dichotomy of life.
It’s you, Rus, or it’s my innocent bloodline, I thought. So I, a pacifist, but sensing I’d simply no alternative, calmly picked up the gun and fired away, point blank, rendering him thoroughly and lastingly lifeless. I woke immediately. I lay quietly in my bed with two thoughts. Which were: Let’s face it, you are not really brave enough to pull that off. And that the actual point of this dream seems to be that we humans are all capable of evil, evil that is committed in the name of combatting evil. And such is the dichotomy of life.
As soon as I posted my March 5 blog, “good vs evil,” I regretted the title. Oh, that’s the worst title, I thought, but too late, sister, you done hit that ‘publish’ command. I sometimes wonder: just who has the right to claim moral superiority anyway? An author who’s done a good job on the dualism theme is Cormac McCarthy in his novel, “The Road.”
(Boy) Are we still the good guys? he said.
(Man) Yes. We’re still the good guys.
(Boy) And we always will be.
(Man) Yes. We always will be.
(Boy) Okay
This father/son conversation follows an incident where… -never mind, I don’t want to spoil it for you. Go read the book.
***
All of which brings to mind an evening when my older grandson was just 3 1/2 years old. I am settling him down, to be tucked in for the night and weaving some sort of tale. Whatever the story is, Older Grandson interrupts me with the question, “Wait, were they good guys?” “Yes, Sweetie, they were good guys.” He nods.
Fast forward a couple of years to a day when I pick Older Grandson up from his after-school Catholic doctrine class, asking, “So, how was it?” “Good,” he replies. A few seconds later he says, “Well, actually it was kind of boring.” I appreciate the honesty.
One day I take Older Grandson to one of those kiddy arcades where children can earn machine-spewed tickets by paying hard-earned money to play Skee Ball and such, then use the accumulated tickets to buy cheap trinkets. We come across a machine that dangles a swath of about two dozen tickets. I look about for someone to whom to call out,”Excuse me, you forgot your tickets,” but no one is near us. My grandson sees my hand reach toward the tickets and says, “Um, but, Grandma, we can’t take those. They belong to someone. That’s not what we do.” He emphasizes the “we” and I know what he means, he means us “good guys.” My hand drops to my side as I say, “I was going to turn them in at the counter, but you’re right, we should leave them there in case the family comes back.” A couple of moments later I confess to him that I’d intended to use the tickets. I hope he appreciates my honesty.
Years later, Devoted Husband and I, with Older Grandson and his family, make a visit to Monticello, Thomas Jefferson’s historic house and plantation in Virginia. As we walk past the slaves’ quarters Older Grandson comments about the injustice of slavery. I think his exact words are “it’s just wrong.” After our tour we stop at the gift shop. Grandson chooses to purchase one of those antiqued copies of the Declaration of Independence. Seatbelt secure in the car, he quickly opens and unrolls his purchase, his eyes zipping across the document as he says aloud, “Where is it? Where’s the part where it says ‘all men are created equal’ ?”
At a family gathering we have a discussion on what my growing-up-too-quickly Older Grandson calls the “ding-dong ditch.” This is where kids ring a doorbell and then run and hide. Some family members think it’s simply a normal adolescent antic, a harmless part of the maturation process. Other family members opine that it’s not something to be overlooked or lightly dismissed, as it is harassment in its infancy. I notice that Older Grandson is alert to everyone’s opinions on a topic in which I suspect he may have, at some point in his young life, witnessed or actually taken part.
***
A couple of weeks ago, I accidentally stumbled across Sr. Helen Prejean on Twitter and now have added her to my ever-lengthening list of Twitterers I “follow.” This puts her up there with Pope Francis, the FCNL (Quakers), Nancy Sinatra, The Gates Foundation, Thich Nhat Hanh, Dalai Lama, The Nelson Mandela Foundation, Merriam-Webster, Senator Al Franken, Chelsea Clinton and such. Twitterers who always manage to admirably and emphatically state their opinions with nary a hint of hate, rancor or vitriol (okay, well maybe some get a bit agitated on occasion, but as long as they never uses any foul language?) At any rate, I’m fussy about whom I choose to follow and if there is too much negativity, I’ll drop you as quickly as I'd drop a bare-handed steaming hot potato. Puhleeze, let's disagree with civility.
Anyway, as you may know Sr. Helen Prejean, author of “Dead Man Walking,” has long advocated for the abolition of the death penalty in the United States. I follow her recent fervent dedication in attempting to stop the planned systematic assembly line killing of eight men now on death row in Arkansas. (As of this posting, one of the eight has been executed -and as a side note: Did you know that the ‘cause of death’ in an execution is officially listed on the death certificate as ‘Homicide?”)
Having read one of Sr. Prejean’s books years ago, having read an excellent article back in 1997 by Northwestern’s Medill lecturer Robert McClory (about a senseless murder and a grieving mother’s forgiveness), having watched Werner Herzog’s documentary “Into the Abyss,” having given the subject my own heartfelt machination, mastication and digestion, having matured as a human being, I now feel strongly that capital punishment is not a solution for, nor a deterrent to crime. I agree that there are those broken humans who must be incarcerated for life to protect society, to prevent gruesome, senseless killings. But, to punish homicide with homicide? (Another side note: If a death row prisoner should become suddenly ill before an execution the execution, in some states, must be delayed until he/she are physically well again, because you cannot execute someone who is unexpectedly physically unwell. The state must ensure they are in good physical health for their age and health history before killing them.)
But, what about those who are not where I am in my thinking? I once wavered on the efficacy and the morality of the death penalty. There are different layers, different tiers… Again, who am I to say what others should feel?
Anyway thank you, Sr. Helen Prejean. I am ever grateful for your calm, sensibly reasoned responses.
***
What does it mean to be a good person? Is a person good because they are taught? Is goodness innate? I’ve no answers…
***
This week we celebrate the birthdate of Older Grandson. Oh, and he’s a good kid. Not perfect, mind you, but a perfectly good child. I mean, he might snitch the occasional extra cookie when Mom and Dad aren’t looking. And maybe he pulls his shoes off without first untying them properly. But when faced with a moral dilemma he knows right from wrong. And should he stumble or falter, I’m certain he’d quickly get right back on track, with grace.
‘Cuz we’re the good guys, right, Buddy?
Happy birthday!!! I am so proud of you.
***
More to soon follow in what I hope is the final of my “The Rule Relating to or Consisting of Gold” series.
***
It is vital that we sow the seeds of goodness in order to cultivate justice, foster accord, and sustain integration, without growing weary.
—Pope Francis, 2017
Not to forgive is to be imprisoned by the past. Not to forgive is to yield oneself to another's control. If one does not forgive, then one is controlled by the other's initiatives and is locked into a sequence of act and response. The present is endlessly overwhelmed and devoured by the past. Forgiveness frees the forgiver. It extracts the forgiver from someone else's nightmare.
—Lance Morrow, 1984 essay